Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
:iconanti-wolf:

Anti-Wolf

"against wolfaboos"

Welcome to Anti-Wolf

Journal Entry: Thu Sep 8, 2011, 6:21 PM
:derpwolf: by FelisTipsy Hate the Ignorance, Not the Animal :derpwolfla: by FelisTipsy


Guidelines and Submissions
:bulletgreen: Love your fellow Anti-Wolfers.
:bulletblack: Your account must be 3+ months old to join. When applying for membership, provide a reason why you want to join. "Love wolves, hate wolfaboos" doesn't sufficiently explain your interest in the group to us. If you are moving from a previous account to re-join, please link us to your previous account in your application.
:bulletgreen: We do not encourage/allow trolling here, nor will we participate in it.
:bulletblack: Do not post links to stupid comment chains, stupid people, or stupid deviations on or off deviantART in the comments section.
:bulletgreen: Submit your work to the proper folder.
:bulletblack: We don't accept screencaps or snark/parody work in the gallery.
:bulletgreen: Don't submit a stamp to the gallery if a similar stamp has already been submitted, unless yours is of better quality.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Why was my join request denied?
A: Either you didn't read the rules, or we found your behavior questionable.

Q: Why do you hate wolves?
A: We don't. We do, however, despise the rabid, childish fanbase and ignorant wolf advocates.

Q: Then why do you have a kill counter displaying wolf death tolls?
A: The kill counter is strictly for informational purposes, and is a tool which a handful of self-proclaimed "pro-wolf" websites and organizations also utilize. Our numbers come from the Department of Fish and Game (for each state, respectively).

Q: Why are you called "Anti-Wolf?"
A: The name is meant to be provocative in order to draw attention to our cause.

Q: What exactly is the point of this group?
A: Our mission is to be a powerhouse of knowledge regarding wolves, informing the public about their true conservation status, proving the dangers of wolves to humans, debunking the lies perpetuated by radical animal rights groups, idiots on the Internet, and wolf advocacy organizations, and promoting the welfare of lesser-known species that truly need our help and attention.

Q: Can I join your group?
A: Absolutely. As long as you're not a wolfaboo and provide reason for wanting to join.

Q: What is a wolfaboo?
A: A person who recklessly advocates for the lives of wolves at the cost of human life and livelihoods, and the ecosystem at large, often harassing and employing threats of violence or death against anyone they perceive as "anti-wolf" (e.g., hunters, wildlife conservationists, taxidermists, furriers), as well as deliberately perpetuating false information about wolves in order to further their radically "pro-wolf" agenda. Not to be confused with wolf fans, who merely harbor a modest interest for the animal or enjoy drawing them.

Q: Your group location says North America; can I still join if I'm not from there?
A: Of course! Anti-Wolf is a global group. North America was selected because we focus moreso on wolves in the United States. We still provide information on wolves all across the world, however.

Q: Why did you hide my comment?
A: If your comment was hidden, chances are you broke the linking rule, or your comment was deemed nonconstructive/unnecessary. Such comments include those meant to negatively provoke group staff and members.

Q: How can I submit art to your group without upsetting my friends and watchers?
A: Submit your work directly to the group, and your watchers will not be notified.


Another hunting season has gone and past, and surprisingly there are not that many pro-wolf pages publishing hysterical nonsense regarding it. Maybe because they realize that the hunts do not affect gray wolf populations that much? Initially, in 2011, when gray wolves were removed from the Endangered Species List, there was quite the uproar regarding the unjust legal rider. What this did was give states their right to manage their wildlife, not the federal government. Of course, as you can imagine, the fringe groups used this opportunity to preach about how gray wolves were on the brink of extinction in attempts to place them back on the Endangered Species List in hopes of protecting them forever. What they didn't realize was that gray wolves were biologically recovered since 2002.

I will be using Idaho as my example to explain the logistics of wolf hunts. Beginning in 1995-96, the USFWS introduced 66 gray wolves to Central Idaho. Since then, Idaho has seen a tremendous 1196% increase1 in their gray wolf population during the 1995-2015 time period.

Idaho's Department of Fish and Game has stated repeatedly through their social media websites and even during wildlife meetings that they do not know for sure2 how many gray wolves live in their state. However, through an estimation technique that has been peer reviewed by the University of Idaho and northern Rocky Mountain wolf managers, they are able to approximate their guesses.



This technique relies on documented packs, mean or median pack size (mean or median of the sample pool of packs where pack counts are considered complete), number of wolves documented in small groups not considered packs, and an estimated percentage (12.5%; Mech and Boitani 2003, p. 170) of the population presumed to be lone wolves. The calculation uses a total count of wolves for those packs where we have a high degree of confidence that we observed all pack members, and applies the mean or median pack size to the remaining documented packs with incomplete counts. We use the statistical mean when number of packs with complete year-end counts is ≥20; otherwise median pack size is applied. Lastly, a multiplication factor of 1.125 is applied to account for lone wolves not associated with packs or smaller groups. Although this technique is feasible given the types of data we are able to collect, no measure of precision is available for this estimate.
Mathematically this technique is represented as:
(D + (P*M) + G)*L

Where for 2014:
D = 175 The number of wolves counted in documented packs with a complete count.
P = 77 Documented packs without a complete count. Number of documented packs extant at the end of 2014 was 104, complete pack size counts were obtained for 27 of those, leaving 77 packs with absent or presumed incomplete counts.
M = 6.5 Mean (or median) pack size.
G = 9 Total count of wolves in radiocollared groups of 2-3 wolves that were not considered packs under Idaho’s definition.
L = 1.125 Lone wolf factor. The midpoint value from a range derived from 5 peer-reviewed studies and 4 non-reviewed papers from studies that occurred in North America (Mech and Boitani 2003).
-Idaho Department of Fish and Game





Using this technique, it is explained in the gray wolf monitoring progress report that at the end of 2013, the gray wolf population was ~659 wolves. The 2014-2015 gray wolf hunt did not meet quota, which was set at 347, a little over 50% of the entire population. Dr. Mech was known for saying, "Wolf population estimates are usually made in winter when the population is at the annual nadir. This approach serves to provide conservative estimates and further ensure that management remains conservative. As indicated above, 28-50% of a wolf population must be killed by humans per year." Note the word, "must" here. This quote is taken out of context only in terms of holding a gray wolf population stable, which wildlife biologists are attempting to do. That number may seem extreme to some, but the hunter success rate for actually going out to kill a gray wolf was under one percent in Idaho in 2009. With a little more than 700 gray wolves being hunted in all three Rocky Mountain states, and a combined tag sales of ~60,000, it is easy to understand where this "under one percentage" figure comes from.

At the end of 2014, the Idaho Department of Fish and Game released their population report. It was determined that there were ~770 wolves living in the state. So what happened? After the wolf hunt, they saw a 16% increase! This was to be expected, after all, since it is well known and documented that wolves reproduce at a rate of 22% per year.3

Dr. Mech has often been criticized for his conservative views on gray wolf hunting, believe it or not. He knows that gray wolf hunting is a very time-consuming and ineffective means for holding the population stable or even decreasing it. Thus, in a 2010 International Wolf Center magazine, he brazenly published an article4 stating his support for trapping, aerial shooting, baiting, and even open hunting during the mating season.



"Think populations, not individuals." - Dr. David Mech

1 Figure 4, Page 8.
2 Bottom link.
3 Page 9.
4 Page 4-10.
Mountain Pygmy Possum by A-Dragonfly-Dreams Save the Mountain Pygmy Possum by lemurkat The Tunnel of Love by Arimala


About
Scientific name: Burramys parvus
Common names: Mountain Pygmy Possum, Broom's Pygmy-Possum, Burramys
Conservation status: Critically Endangered
Geographic range:

Fun Facts
:bulletgreen: This species is the only Australian mammal restricted to an alpine habitat, and the world's only hibernating marsupial.
:bulletblack: This species only occupies three known geographically isolated locations, each with a genetically distinct population.
:bulletgreen: Unlike most possums, this species is terrestrial.




Burramys on Wikipedia | Burramys on ARKive | Burramys on IUCN Redlist



The Burramys was suggested by sulfide! Leave your suggestions for September's animal in the comments section, and be sure to tell us what you thought of this month's animal!
More Journal Entries

Comments


Add a Comment:
 
:iconmusa-the-guardian:
Musa-the-Guardian Featured By Owner 1 day ago  Hobbyist General Artist
m.youtube.com/watch?v=QelBpKEi…

This is a great video for those who are willing to know how trapping rules work.
Reply
:iconrussfairchild:
RussFairchild Featured By Owner 5 days ago
Thank you for the request, really appreciate it!
Reply
(1 Reply)
:iconechoingharmony:
EchoingHarmony Featured By Owner Aug 25, 2015  Hobbyist Artist
Oh my how bloody brilliant this group is.  Llama Emoji-11 (Come Here) [V1] 
Reply
:iconmusa-the-guardian:
Musa-the-Guardian Featured By Owner Aug 17, 2015  Hobbyist General Artist
mobile.nytimes.com/2014/03/10/…
What do you guys think?
Reply
(1 Reply)
:iconwinterjackal:
WinterJackal Featured By Owner Jul 31, 2015
The African golden jackal is now classified as a separate species (Canis anthus) from the Eurasian golden jackal. I thought you may find this information to be interesting. It's something I've thought for quite a while and it's awesome to see it confirmed. 
Reply
(1 Reply)
Add a Comment: